User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-I917/UCWEB2.4.0.188/47/999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSGH-I917closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-SGH-I917 UCWEB2.4.0.188closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close SamsungSGH-I917mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 2.4 SamsungSGH-I917smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.4.0close SamsungSGH-I917closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.4.0.188close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 2.4.0.188 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 2.4Gecko SamsungSGH-I917mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 2.4.0.188close SamsungSGH-I917closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:29 | by ThaDafinser