User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Genieo/1.0 http://www.genieo.com/webfilter.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesGenieo Web filter0 Detail
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/crawler.yaml
close closecloseclosecloseyesGenieo Web Filterclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesGenieo Web FilterBot/Crawler0.028 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesGenieo Web Filterclose0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesGenieo/1.0close0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesGenieo Web filter0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGenieoclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Genieo Bot 1.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesGenieo Web Filterclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGenieo Web Filterclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:27 | by ThaDafinser