User agent detail

LG-MU575/V0.9 Obigo/Q05A Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGMU575closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.019 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 5.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-MU575 V0.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGMU575mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q05A LGMU575smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close LGMU575closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q05A Browser Q05A LGLGMU575closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A LGMU575mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose LGMU575Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q05Aclose LGMU575closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:27 | by ThaDafinser