User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) KHTML/4.8.4 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-295.php
Konqueror 4.8KHTML 4.8Linux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.8KHTML 4.8Linux Desktop0.026 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.8KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.8.4closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.8 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.8KHTML 4.8.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.8closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:23 | by ThaDafinser