User agent detail

Locubot (compatible; Googlebot; msnbot)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesLocubotBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesLocubotBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesLocubotclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Googlebot msnbotcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesGoogleclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesBingBotSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotCrawler0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Googlebot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.32102 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:22 | by ThaDafinser