User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Linux 2.2.17-14 i586) Opera 6.0 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux 2.2.17closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 6.0Presto Linux Desktop0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 6.0closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.0Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.0closeLinux 2.2.17closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 6.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.17301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.0 Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.0closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:19 | by ThaDafinser