User agent detail

Alcatel-OT-v770A/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ObigoInternetBrowser/Q03C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close AlcatelOT-v770Aclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.025 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 3.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Alcatel-OT-v770A 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM AlcatelOne Touch v770Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q03C AlcatelOT-v770Asmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close AlcatelOT-v770Acloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 03 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C AlcatelOne Touch v770Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo InternetBrowserclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:16 | by ThaDafinser