User agent detail

HTC-Radar+C110e/UCWEB2.2.0.157/47/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCRadar+C110eclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HTC-Radar closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close HTCRadar+C110emobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 2.2 HTCRadarsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.2.0close HTCRadar+C110ecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.2.0.157close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 2.2.0.157 HTC Radarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 2.2Gecko HTCRadar+C110emobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 2.2.0.157close HTCRadarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:15 | by ThaDafinser