User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Origyn Web Browser; U; AmigaOS 4.0; xx) AppleWebKit/534.0 (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/534.0) OWB/3.32
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Origyn Webkit 534.0AmigaOS 4.0desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.083 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.072 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 534.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 534.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

OWB closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit AmigaOS 4.0desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeAmigaOS 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit 534.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.22361 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Origyn Webkit 534.0AmigaOS 4.0desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Oregano Web Browser closeAmigaOS 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:14 | by ThaDafinser