User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD) AppleWebKit/538.15+ Midori/0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Midori 0.5Webkit 538.15NetBSD desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Midori 0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Midori 0.5closeNetBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Midori 0.5WebKit NetBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.5closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.15closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.17201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Midori 0.5closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Midori 0.5WebKit 538.15a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Midori 0.5Webkit 538.15NetBSD desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Midori 0.5closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:14 | by ThaDafinser