User agent detail

LGE-VX6000 UP.Browser/4.1.27
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGVX6000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGVX6000Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LGE-VX6000 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27close LGVX6000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGVX6000smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.27close LGVX6000closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose1.26607 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 4.1 LGVX6000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGVX6000Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27close LGVX6000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:09 | by ThaDafinser