User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; HbbTV/1.2.1 (; Philips; 55PUS780912; ; PHILIPSTV; CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/4.4.1 SmartTvA/3.0.0 Firmware/014.002.026.129 (PhilipsTV, 3.1.1,)en) ) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux Philips55PUS780912tvcloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 PUS7809televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Desktop0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 12.50closeLinux Smartphone OS closecloseDesktopclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 12.50closeLinux media-playercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux Philips55PUS780912tv0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux Philips55PUS780912closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 PhilipsPUS7809 Net TVtelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Maple Browser closeGNU/Linux Samsung Smart TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:08 | by ThaDafinser