User agent detail

OWB/3.12 (AmigaOS 4.1; ppc; U)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Odyssey 3.12 AmigaOS 4.1desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
OWB 3.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Odyssey 3.12closeAmigaOS 4.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
AmigaOS 4.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25302 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Odyssey 3.12 AmigaOS 4.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAmigaOS 4.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:07 | by ThaDafinser