User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; X11; Linux x86_64; Google-StructuredDataTestingTool; +http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-208.php
yesGoogle Structured-Data TestingToolBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesGoogle Structured-Data TestingToolBot/Crawler0.055 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesGoogle Structured-Data TestingToolclose0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.22401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.17301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Google+ Snippet Fetcher Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:04 | by ThaDafinser