User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Ubuntu; Mobile) WebKit/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-ubuntu.yaml
Webkit 537.36Ubuntu Touch mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeUbuntu closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeUbuntu Touch mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Ubuntu desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 537.36closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.17101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

5.0WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.28002 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 537.36Ubuntu Touch mobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close UbuntuTouch OSFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Ubuntu Web Browser close Ubuntu Phonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:01 | by ThaDafinser