User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; IRIX64 IP35; xx; rv:1.8.1.25pre) Gecko/20121113 SeaMonkey/1.1.20pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 1.1.20Gecko 1.8.1IRIX desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.25preclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.1.20precloseIRIX desktop-browsercloseclose0.88305 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko IRIX 64desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.1.20preclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.1.20close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.25closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.1.20precloseIRIX closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.1.20preGecko 20121113IRIX closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.1.20Gecko 1.8.1IRIX desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SeaMonkey 1.1.20precloseIRIX IP35closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:00 | by ThaDafinser