User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 Opera/9.5 (KDDI-SH3F; BREW; Opera Mobi; U; ja) Presto/2.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/mobilephone_au.yaml
Opera SH3Fcloseau closeclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera MobicloseBREWOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera Mobile close SharpSH005mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.5Presto Brew KDDISH3Ffeature phoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.5closeBREW closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.5Presto 2.2.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mobile 9.5Presto 2.2.1Brew SharpSH005mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera SH3Fcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera Mobile close KDDITS3OFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera Mobile close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:58 | by ThaDafinser