User agent detail

PIAWindows/1.0 Name/HTC-Touch Diamond2 T5360 Software/5.2.21892 appMode/2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCTouch Diamond2 T5360 Softwareclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PIAWindows 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeWindows closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows HTCTouch Diamond2 T5360 Softwaremobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
HTCTouchsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows HTCTouch Diamond2 T5360 Softwarecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Windows HTC Touchcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows HTCTouch Diamond2 T5360 Softwaremobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows HTCTouchcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:57 | by ThaDafinser