User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile 6.0) SAMSUNG-GT-i8000V/BUII1
Additional headers
UA-OS Windows CE (Pocket PC) - Version 5.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.5I8000 Omnia IImobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IEMobile 8.12Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
IEMobile 8.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 8.12closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows SamsungGT-i8000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IE Mobile 8.12Trident Windows CE SamsungOmnia IIsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE SamsungGT-i8000Vcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 6.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.13701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer Mobile Windows Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44504 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.5SamsungI8000 Omnia IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile SamsungGT-i8000Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IEMobile 8.12closeWindows CESamsungGT-i8000Vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-17 06:37:41 | by ThaDafinser