User agent detail

MOT-P2K-C/10.01 UP/4.1.21b UP.Browser/4.1.21b-XXXX
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaP2K-Cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-P2K-C 10.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.21bclose MotorolaP2K-Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaP2Ksmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.21close MotorolaP2K-Ccloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.21b closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 4.1 MotorolaP2K-Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close MotorolaP2K-CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.21bclose MotorolaP2Kcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:55 | by ThaDafinser