User agent detail

Mosaic/1.0r2 (Macintosh; I; 68040)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-mosaic.yaml
NCSA Mosaic 1.0 Mac OS desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Mosaic 1.0r2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NCSA Mosaic 1.0closeMacOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mosaic 1.0r2 Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NCSA Mosaic 1.0 Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Mosaic 1.0r2closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:55 | by ThaDafinser