User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Google Desktop/5.9.1005.12335; http://desktop.google.com/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Google Desktop 5.9WebKit unknownunknown unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/misc.yaml
Google Desktop closeUNKNOWN closeclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Google Desktop 5.9WebKit Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Google Desktop 5.9close closecloseDesktopclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Google Desktop 5.9 closeclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Google Desktop closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:53 | by ThaDafinser