User agent detail

LG-G828/V100/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGG828closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
LG JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
LG closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-G828 V100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close LGG828mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGG828smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGG828closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGG828closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
LGG828mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGG828Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close LGG828closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:52 | by ThaDafinser