User agent detail

Opera/6.02 (Windows NT 4.0; U) [de]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Opera 6.02Presto unknownWinNT 4.0unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 6.02Presto WinNT 4.0Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.02closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.02Presto Windows NTdesktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.02closeWindows NT 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.2closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 6.02 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.02closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.2 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.02 Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.02closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 6.02closeWindows NT 4.0Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.02closeWindows NT 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:51 | by ThaDafinser