User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060910 MultiZilla/1.8.2.0i SeaMonkey/1.0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
MultiZilla 1.8.2.0iclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.0.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.0.5closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.25601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.0Gecko OS/2 desktop0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.0.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.0.5close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.0.5closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.0.5Gecko 20060910OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.0.5Gecko 1.8.0OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
MultiZilla 1.8.2.0iclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:49 | by ThaDafinser