User agent detail

Midori/0.2 (X11; Linux; U; c) WebKit/534.7+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.2Webkit 534.7Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Midori 0.2WebKit Linux Desktop0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Midori 0.2closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Midori 0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Midori 0.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Midori 0.2WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

WebKit 534.7closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose1.18107 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Midori 0.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.081 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Midori 0.2WebKit 534.7Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Midori 0.2Webkit 534.7Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Midori 0.2closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:39 | by ThaDafinser