User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Nitro) Opera 8.50 [ja]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
Opera 8.50 DSgaming:portableclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IE 6.0Trident Desktop0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 6.0close closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 6.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 8.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 8.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 8.50close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 8.50Presto Nintendo Mobile yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 8.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.50close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 8.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 8.50 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 8.50 NintendoDSgaming:portableyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close NintendoDSOther Mobileyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 8.50close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:39 | by ThaDafinser