User agent detail

Opera/6.0 (Windows XP; U) [de]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.0Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 6.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.17301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.0 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.0 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 6.0closeWindows XP Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.0closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:35 | by ThaDafinser