User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; xx; XT897) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.9.2.467 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.9Gecko Android Photon Qmobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close AISIris 800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 9.9 MotorolaPhoton Qsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.9.2close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 9.9.2.467 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 9.9Gecko Android MotorolaPhoton Qmobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 9.9.2.467close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:34 | by ThaDafinser