User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534 (KHTML, like Gecko) BingPreview/1.0b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
BingPreview 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesBingPreviewclose0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows 6.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesBing Previewclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BingPreview 1.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.17401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

BingPreview 1.0bWebKit 534Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesBing Previewclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:32 | by ThaDafinser