User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (Compatible; AOL-IWENG 3.0; Win16)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
AOL closeWindows 3.11closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 2.0Gecko Desktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 2.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 2.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 3.1 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 2.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose1.33008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 2.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Navigator 2.0 Windows desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
AOL closeWindows 3.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:22 | by ThaDafinser