User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; ja-JP; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko 1.8.1Mac OS desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.2precloseMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.1closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko Mac desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.1close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.2closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.18601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.1Gecko 20070111Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko 1.8.1Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SeaMonkey 1.1closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:18 | by ThaDafinser