User agent detail

LG-G7100 AU/4.10 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGG7100closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
AU 4.1 Brew 2.0LGG7100Mobile Phoneyes0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-G7100 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close LGG7100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGG7100smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGG7100closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.94705 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGG7100closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
AU 4.10 LGG7100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGG7100Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close LGG7100closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:18 | by ThaDafinser