User agent detail

Apache-HttpClient/UNAVAILABLE (java 1.4)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/misc.yaml
HTTP Library JavacloseUNKNOWN closeclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.052 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.078 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Apache-HttpClient UNAVAILABLEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesApache Httpdclose0.22101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Java 0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Apache-HttpClient close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.089 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesApache Httpdclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library Javaclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:12 | by ThaDafinser