User agent detail

ALCATEL_A392G/1.0 ObigoInternetBrowser/Q05A[TF013513002719521000000013182904148]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
MobileDetect
2.8.22
vendor/mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib/tests/providers/vendors/Alcatel.php
close closeA392Gcloseyescloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.021 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 5.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ALCATEL closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM AlcatelA392Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q05A AlcatelA392Gsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39402 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A AlcatelA392Gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose AlcatelA392GFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo InternetBrowserclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:06 | by ThaDafinser