User agent detail

Mozilla/4.00 [en] (Compatible; RISC OS 4.39; MSIE 5.01; Windows 98; Oregano 1.10)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-riscos.yaml
Oregano 1.10 RISC OS 4.39desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 5.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 5.01closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Oregano 1.10closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.22101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 5.01Trident Windows 98desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.1closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 5.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 5.1Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Oregano 1.10 RISC OS 4.39desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Oregano 1.10closeWindows 98closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:04 | by ThaDafinser