User agent detail

LG-KG77 MIC/1.1.14 MIDP-2.0/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGKG77closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-KG77 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close LGKG77mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGKG77smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGKG77closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGKG77closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
LGKG77mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGKG77Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close LGKG77closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:03 | by ThaDafinser