User agent detail

CB/Nutch-1.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesNutch-based Botcrawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesNutchBot/Crawler0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesNutchclose0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
CB Nutchcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesApache Nutchclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesNutch-based Botcrawler0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNutchclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesApache Nutchclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:01:02 | by ThaDafinser