User agent detail

Lynx/2.8.9dev.1 libwww-FM/2.14 SSL-MM/1.4.1 GNUTLS/3.3.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-905.php
Lynx 2.8unknown unknownLinux unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Lynx 2.8 Linux Desktop0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Lynx 2.8closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Lynx 2.8.9dev.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Lynx 2.8.9dev.1close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Lynx 2.8Text-based 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Lynx 2.8.9dev.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Lynx 2.8.9close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Lynx 2.8.9dev.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Lynx 2.8.9dev.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Lynx 2.8.9 closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LynxBrowserOther Non-Mobilecloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Lynx 2.8.9dev.1close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:59 | by ThaDafinser