User agent detail

Mozilla/5.5 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.1) Sitespider+ b432.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Sitespider close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 5.5closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 5.5closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSitespiderclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 5.5 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:57 | by ThaDafinser