User agent detail

LG-GR500/V09e Teleca/Q7.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGGR500closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 7.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-GR500 V09ecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGGR500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGGR500smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGGR500closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGGR500closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7.0 LGGR500mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGGR500Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7.0close LGGR500closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:47 | by ThaDafinser