User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (MTK; Nucleus; U; en-US) Presto/2.4.18 Version/10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.2Android unknownunknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera Mobile 10.00closeAndroid closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 10.00close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 10.00Presto MTK / Nucleus yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.0close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.18 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.18MRE mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 10.00close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:44 | by ThaDafinser