User agent detail

360%20Lite/5.3.2 CFNetwork/672.0.8 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-360.yaml
Qihoo 360 Browser 5.3.2 iOS 7.0.3mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
CFNetwork WebKit iOS 7.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.015 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
CFNetwork closeiOS closecloseMobile Deviceyesyesclose0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
360 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Qihoo 360 Browser 5.3.2closeiOS 7.0.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
iOS 7.0yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 672.0.8closeiOS 7.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Qihoo 360 Browser 5.3.2 iOS 7.0.3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:44 | by ThaDafinser