User agent detail

QuickTime.7.7.4 (qtver=7.7.4;os=Windows NT 6.0Service Pack 2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
QuickTime 7.7.4 Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
QuickTime 7.7 WinVista 6.0Desktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
QuickTime 7.7closeWinVista closecloseDesktopclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
QuickTime closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeWindows 6.0Serviceclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QuickTime 7.7.4closeWindows 6.0media-playercloseclose0.22301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
QuickTime 7.7 Windows Vistadesktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QuickTime 7.7.4 Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows Vistacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:42 | by ThaDafinser