User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060314 Flock/0.5.13.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Flock 0.5Gecko unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Flock 0.5Gecko Linux Desktop0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Flock 0.5closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Flock 0.5.13.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Flock 0.5Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Flock 0.5.13closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Flock 0.5.13.2Gecko 1.8.0.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Flock 0.5.13.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Flock 0.5.13.2Gecko 20060314Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Flock 0.5.13Gecko 1.8.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Flock 0.5.13.2closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:41 | by ThaDafinser