User agent detail

VMVID Android Application (13, vmvid v2.1) - ZTE ATLAS W zte - 00000000-280C-CBB7-E544-8790554E377F
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close ZTEATLAS Wclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
VMVID closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeAndroidOS Applicationcloseclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Android Browser closeAndroid ZTEATLASmobile-browseryescloseclose0.29502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Android Browser WebKit Android ZTEATLASsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid ZTEATLAS Wcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
VMVID Android 2.1ZTEATLAS Wmobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Android close Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid ZTEATLAScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:40 | by ThaDafinser