User agent detail

VMS_Mosaic/3.8-1 (Motif;OpenVMS V7.3-2 DEC 3000 - M700) libwww/2.12_Mosaic
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/other.yaml
VMS Mosaic 3.8 OpenVMS 7.3desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Mosaic 3.8 OpenVMS 0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Mosaic 3.8closeOpenVMS closecloseclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
VMS closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

VMS Mosaic 3.8closeOpenVMS 7.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.21701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Motorolaifsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mosaic 3.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
VMS Mosaic 3.8 OpenVMS 7.3desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Mosaic 3.8close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:34 | by ThaDafinser