User agent detail

WebAlta Crawler/2.0 (http://www.webalta.net/ru/about_webmaster.html) (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru-RU)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
WebAlta Crawler 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesWebAlta CrawlerBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesWebAlta Crawlerclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
WebAlta closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesWebAlta Crawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:34 | by ThaDafinser