User agent detail

AppleCoreMedia/1.0.0.11G63b (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5; fr_ca)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-378.php
AppleCoreMedia 1.0WebKit unknownMacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
AppleCoreMedia 1.0WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
AppleCoreMedia 1.0closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleCoreMedia 1.0.0.11G63bcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeOS X 10_7_5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.22801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac 10.7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeMac OS X 10.7.5Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS X 10.7.5 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:31 | by ThaDafinser