User agent detail

Flint/173 CFNetwork/520.5.1 Darwin/11.4.2 (x86_64) (MacBookPro8%2C2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
CFNetwork 0.0WebKit unknownMacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.019 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
CFNetwork closeDarwin closecloseDesktopclose0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Flint 173closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac 10.7desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 520.5.1closeMac OS X 10.7.4AppleMacBookPro8,2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OS X Lion 10.7.5desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 5.1closeMac OS X 10.7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:31 | by ThaDafinser